Finance Foundations — Post 2 of 2

What Do the Numbers
Actually Mean?

Ratios turn raw numbers into insight. Trends turn snapshots into stories. Red flags tell you when to run.

Bahgat
Bahgat
Feb 2026 · 30 min read
Same Revenue. Same Profit. Different Story.
Thriving Dying
45%
Gross Margin
22%
+18%
Revenue Growth
-3%
$800M
Free Cash Flow
-$200M
0.4x
Debt/Equity
4.2x
28%
ROE
6%
Only ratios reveal the truth

Two companies both report $10 billion in revenue and $1 billion in profit. Identical, right?

One is thriving — growing fast, generating cash, rewarding shareholders. The other is slowly dying — margins shrinking, debt piling up, cash bleeding out.

The only way to tell them apart: ratios.

In Post 1, you learned to read the three financial statements. Now you'll learn what the numbers mean — and how analysts spot the story behind them.

Part 1
Profitability Ratios — How Much Do They Keep?

You already know Netflix's revenue ($33.7B) and net income ($5.4B) from Post 1. But what do those numbers mean? Is $5.4B in profit good? Bad? Average?

A number by itself is meaningless. $5.4 billion in profit sounds impressive — until you learn the company spent $33.7 billion to earn it. That's a 16% margin. But if a competitor earns $2 billion on $5 billion in revenue, their 40% margin tells a completely different story about their business model.

This is why ratios exist: they make numbers comparable across companies of different sizes, industries, and time periods.

The Margin Waterfall

Remember the waterfall from Post 1? Each level of margin tells you something different about the business:

Gross Margin
42.5%
Gross Profit / Revenue
Question it answers: Is the product itself profitable? After paying for content, how much of each dollar is left?
Operating Margin
20.6%
Operating Income / Revenue
Question it answers: Is the overall business machine efficient? After all operating costs, what stays?
Net Margin
16.0%
Net Income / Revenue
Question it answers: After absolutely everything — including debt interest and taxes — what does the company actually keep?
FCF Margin
20.5%
Free Cash Flow / Revenue
Question it answers: What percentage of revenue turns into actual free cash? (The most honest margin.)

EBITDA: The Controversial Metric

EBITDA stands for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. It strips out financing costs (interest), tax effects, and non-cash expenses (D&A) to show the "pure operating profit."

EBITDA
EBITDA = Net Income + Interest + Taxes + Depreciation + Amortization
Or equivalently: Operating Income + D&A

Management loves EBITDA because it makes profits look bigger (by adding back real costs). Investors use it carefully — it's useful for comparing companies with different debt levels or tax situations, but it can hide real problems. As Warren Buffett famously said: "Does management think the tooth fairy pays for capital expenditures?"

When EBITDA Is Useful vs. Misleading

Useful: Comparing Netflix (lots of content amortization) to Disney+ (different accounting). EBITDA removes the accounting noise. Misleading: A company with massive capital expenditures reporting great EBITDA while burning cash. Always check EBITDA against FCF — if they diverge wildly, be skeptical.

Check Your Understanding
Company A: 60% gross margin, 5% net margin. Company B: 30% gross margin, 15% net margin. Which business model is more efficient overall?
Company A — higher gross margin means better product
Company B — it converts more revenue to actual profit
They're equal — margins are just different
Company B is more efficient at converting revenue to profit. Company A has a great product (60% gross margin!) but spends enormously on operations, leaving only 5% as profit. Think of a luxury brand that spends fortunes on marketing. Company B has thinner product margins but runs a lean operation, keeping 15% of every dollar. The "best" depends on your perspective, but B generates more bottom-line profit per dollar of revenue.
Part 2
Efficiency & Return Ratios — How Well Do They Use What They Have?

Profitability tells you how much the company keeps. Return ratios tell you how well it uses what it has. A company could be highly profitable but terribly inefficient — sitting on mountains of assets that aren't generating much return.

Asset Turnover: Revenue Per Dollar of Assets

Asset Turnover
0.69x
Revenue / Total Assets = $33,723M / $48,731M
For every $1 of assets Netflix owns, it generates $0.69 in revenue. This measures how efficiently the company uses its assets to generate sales.

Asset turnover varies wildly by industry. A grocery store might have 3-4x turnover (thin margins, high volume). A pharmaceutical company might have 0.3x (huge asset base, high margins). Netflix at 0.69x is typical for a content-heavy tech company — they own a massive content library ($17.2B) that generates revenue over many years.

ROA: Return on Assets

Return on Assets (ROA)
11.1%
Net Income / Total Assets = $5,408M / $48,731M
For every $1 of assets, Netflix generates 11.1 cents in profit. This measures how profitably the company uses ALL its resources, regardless of how they're funded.

ROE: Return on Equity

Return on Equity (ROE)
26.3%
Net Income / Total Equity = $5,408M / $20,588M
For every $1 shareholders have invested, Netflix generates 26.3 cents in profit. This is the return that shareholders care about most.

The ROE vs. ROA Gap: The Leverage Effect

Notice something? Netflix's ROE (26.3%) is more than double its ROA (11.1%). How can the return to shareholders be so much higher than the return on total assets?

The answer is leverage (debt). Netflix borrows money at a cost lower than the return its assets generate, so the extra return flows to shareholders. This amplification effect is captured by a famous formula:

The DuPont Decomposition (Preview)
ROE = Net Margin × Asset Turnover × Leverage
Netflix: 16.0% × 0.69x × 2.37x = 26.3%

This formula decomposes ROE into three drivers: how much profit the company makes (margin), how efficiently it uses assets (turnover), and how much debt it uses (leverage = Assets/Equity). The advanced finance series covers this in depth with the DuPont analysis post.

Industry-specific efficiency metrics (ARPU, subscribers)

Beyond universal ratios, every industry has its own efficiency metrics:

  • Subscription businesses (Netflix): ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) = Revenue / Subscribers. Netflix ARPU ~ $130/year. Tells you how well you monetize each customer.
  • SaaS companies: CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) and LTV (Lifetime Value). LTV/CAC > 3x is generally healthy.
  • Retail: Revenue per square foot, same-store sales growth.
  • Manufacturing: Inventory turnover = COGS / Average Inventory. High turnover = efficient inventory management.
  • Banks: Net Interest Margin = (Interest Earned - Interest Paid) / Average Assets. The core profitability measure for banks.

These industry-specific metrics often matter more than generic ratios for understanding how well a specific type of business is performing.

Check Your Understanding
Company X: 5% margin, 10x asset turnover. Company Y: 50% margin, 0.5x asset turnover. Which generates higher return on assets (ROA)?
Company X: 5% × 10x = 50% ROA
Company Y: 50% × 0.5x = 25% ROA
They're the same
Company X generates twice the return on assets! Despite having much thinner margins, its lightning-fast asset turnover more than compensates. Think of a grocery store (thin margins, fast turnover) vs. a luxury jeweler (fat margins, slow turnover). Neither strategy is inherently "better," but this shows why margins alone don't tell the full story. ROA = Margin × Turnover captures both dimensions.
Part 3
Liquidity & Leverage — Can They Pay Their Bills?

A company can be profitable and still go bankrupt. How? If it can't pay its bills when they come due. Profitability is about the long term. Liquidity is about surviving next month.

Current Ratio: The Quick Health Check

Current Ratio
1.12x
Current Assets / Current Liabilities = $9,918M / $8,860M
For every $1 due within a year, Netflix has $1.12 in liquid assets. Above 1.0 = can pay bills. Below 1.0 = potential trouble.

Netflix's current ratio is 1.12x — just above the comfort line. This is typical for subscription businesses that have predictable, recurring revenue. They don't need a huge buffer because next month's subscriber payments are highly reliable.

Debt-to-Equity: How Much Debt?

Debt-to-Equity (D/E)
0.69x
Total Debt / Total Equity = $14,168M / $20,588M
For every $1 of shareholders' equity, Netflix has $0.69 in long-term debt. Below 1.0x is generally considered conservative.

Netflix's D/E of 0.69x is moderate. Compare this to a few years ago when Netflix was borrowing aggressively for content — their D/E was well above 1.5x. The company has been systematically paying down debt as cash flow has improved.

Interest Coverage: Can They Afford the Debt?

Interest Coverage
8.7x
Operating Income / Interest Expense = $6,954M / $797M
Netflix earns 8.7x its interest payments. Above 3x is comfortable. Below 1.5x is danger territory.

Interest coverage of 8.7x means Netflix could see its operating income drop by 85% and still cover its interest payments. This is a very comfortable position.

Net Debt / EBITDA: How Many Years to Pay Off?

Net Debt / EBITDA
~1.0x
(Total Debt - Cash) / EBITDA
"How many years of current earnings would it take to pay off all debt?" Under 2x is comfortable. Above 5x is risky.

When Leverage Is Good vs. Dangerous

Debt isn't inherently bad. It's a tool. The question is whether the company uses it wisely:

Good Leverage
  • Borrowed to invest in growth that generates higher returns than the interest cost
  • Stable, predictable cash flows to service debt
  • D/E below 1.5x, interest coverage above 4x
  • Netflix borrowing at 4-5% to build a content library generating 20%+ returns
Dangerous Leverage
  • Borrowed to cover operating losses (not investment)
  • Volatile cash flows make debt payments unpredictable
  • D/E above 3x, interest coverage below 2x
  • A cyclical company borrowing at the peak of its cycle
Netflix's Debt Journey

From 2015-2019, Netflix borrowed over $15 billion to fund its original content push. Wall Street was nervous — the company was profitable but cash-flow-negative. By 2023, the bet paid off: the content library was generating enough subscriber revenue to produce $6.9B in free cash flow, and Netflix began paying down debt. D/E dropped from ~1.8x to 0.69x. The debt was a strategic weapon, not reckless spending.

Check Your Understanding
A company has D/E of 5x and interest coverage of 1.5x. Should you worry?
No — some industries use lots of debt
Yes — very high debt and barely covering interest is a warning sign
Only if the stock price is falling
This is a serious warning sign. D/E of 5x means the company has 5 times more debt than equity — it's extremely leveraged. Interest coverage of 1.5x means operating income barely covers interest payments. A small decline in earnings could make interest payments impossible, leading to default. While some industries (like utilities or real estate) operate with higher leverage, 5x D/E with only 1.5x interest coverage is dangerous in almost any context.
Part 4
Growth Metrics — How Fast Are They Growing?

A company making $1 billion in profit is very different depending on whether that profit is growing 20% per year or shrinking 5% per year. Growth is the engine that makes everything else work — expanding margins, rising stock prices, and increasing returns.

Year-over-Year (YoY) Growth

YoY Growth Rate
Growth = (This Year − Last Year) / Last Year × 100
Netflix Revenue Growth 2022-2023: ($33,723M - $31,616M) / $31,616M = 6.7%

YoY growth is the simplest growth metric. Netflix grew revenue 6.7% from 2022 to 2023. For a $33B company, that's another $2.1 billion in new revenue — impressive in absolute terms, but relatively modest for a "growth stock."

CAGR: The Compound Growth Rate

One year can be misleading. Maybe 2022 was a bad year, or 2023 had a one-time boost. CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) smooths the picture over multiple years:

CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate)
CAGR = (Ending Value / Starting Value)^(1/years) − 1
Netflix 5-year Revenue CAGR: ($33,723M / $20,156M)^(1/5) - 1 ≈ 10.8%

Netflix's 5-year revenue CAGR of ~10.8% tells a more stable story than any single year's growth rate. It means Netflix's revenue has been growing at roughly 10.8% per year, compounding, over the past 5 years.

Revenue Growth vs. Earnings Growth

Both matter, but they tell different stories:

Revenue Growth
Shows whether the business is getting bigger. More customers, higher prices, or new products. The top line drives everything else.
Earnings Growth
Shows whether the business is getting more profitable. Can come from revenue growth, cost cuts, or operating leverage (fixed costs spread over more revenue).

The best companies grow both. A company growing revenue 20% while earnings grow 30% is becoming more efficient at scale — that's operating leverage, and it's one of the most powerful forces in business.

Part 5
Reading the Story — What Trends Tell You

A single number is a fact. A trend is a story. One year of 20% margin tells you almost nothing. Five years of margins rising from 10% to 20% tells you the business is improving. Five years of margins falling from 30% to 20% tells you something is going wrong.

This is where financial analysis stops being math and starts being detective work.

What Good Trends Look Like

Benchmarking: Numbers Need Context

Netflix's 16% net margin — is that good? You can't answer that without comparing to something:

Company Net Margin ROE D/E
Netflix 16.0% 26.3% 0.69x
Streaming Industry Average ~5-10% ~10-15% varies
Benchmark Well above average Well above average Moderate

Netflix's 16% net margin looks even better when you know most streaming competitors are barely profitable (or losing money). Context transforms a number into an insight.

Red Flags: Warning Signs in Financials

Experienced analysts look for specific patterns that signal trouble ahead. Here are the most important:

Revenue growing, but cash flow declining
The company is booking revenue that doesn't convert to cash. Possible aggressive accounting or deteriorating collections.
Receivables growing faster than revenue
Customers are paying slower, or the company is stuffing channels with product that hasn't really been "sold."
Debt increasing rapidly with no corresponding asset growth
Borrowing to cover operating losses, not to invest. This is the path to bankruptcy.
Margins shrinking year over year
Pricing power is eroding, competition is intensifying, or costs are rising faster than revenue.
OCF consistently below Net Income
Profit isn't backed by cash. The "quality of earnings" is low. Investigate what's absorbing the cash.

Quality of Earnings: Is Profit Real?

The ultimate test: Does Operating Cash Flow exceed Net Income?

Netflix OCF
$7,274M
Netflix Net Income
$5,408M

Netflix's OCF ($7.3B) exceeds Net Income ($5.4B). The earnings are high quality — every dollar of profit is backed by more than a dollar of actual cash. When you see the opposite pattern (high profit, low cash flow), dig deeper.

Check Your Understanding
Revenue is up 20% this year, but receivables (money owed to the company) are up 50%. Good or bad?
Good — revenue growth is strong
Bad — receivables growing faster than revenue is a red flag
Neutral — receivables always grow with revenue
Receivables should grow at roughly the same rate as revenue. If revenue grows 20% but receivables grow 50%, it means customers are paying slower — or worse, the company is recognizing revenue that may never turn into cash. This is one of the classic "earnings quality" red flags. Some of history's biggest accounting scandals (Enron, WorldCom) showed this pattern before the fraud was discovered.
Part 6
Advanced Concepts — The Expert's Toolkit

The ratios from Parts 1-5 will handle 80% of your analysis needs. But there are a few deeper concepts that separate a competent analyst from a good one.

Working Capital: Cash Trapped in Operations

Working Capital
Working Capital = Current Assets − Current Liabilities
Netflix: $9,918M − $8,860M = $1,058M

Working capital is the cash tied up in the day-to-day cycle of business: money sitting in receivables (customers haven't paid yet), inventory (products waiting to sell), minus payables (bills you haven't paid yet).

A growing business often needs more working capital — more inventory, more receivables. This is called a "working capital investment" and it absorbs cash. A company that manages working capital efficiently (getting paid fast, paying suppliers slowly) frees up cash for other uses.

Free Cash Flow Mastery

We introduced FCF in Post 1. Now let's understand why it's the metric that serious investors care about most:

Free Cash Flow
FCF = Operating Cash Flow − Capital Expenditures
Netflix: $7,274M − $345M = $6,929M

FCF represents the cash available after maintaining and growing the business. It can be used to:

Why Warren Buffett cares about FCF margin

Buffett famously focuses on "owner earnings" — his version of free cash flow. His reasoning:

  • Net income can be manipulated through accounting choices (depreciation methods, revenue recognition timing, one-time charges). FCF is harder to fake — cash either moved or it didn't.
  • CapEx is real: A company must maintain its assets to stay competitive. Ignoring CapEx (as EBITDA does) pretends these costs don't exist.
  • FCF is what you can actually distribute: Dividends, buybacks, and debt repayment all come from FCF, not net income.

Netflix's 20.5% FCF margin means that for every $100 in revenue, $20.50 becomes truly free cash. Buffett would compare this to the company's reinvestment needs — if FCF margin is high and stable, the business generates "owner earnings" that compound over time.

Debt Analysis: Beyond the Ratios

D/E and interest coverage give you the big picture. But debt has nuances:

Netflix's debt is mostly long-term bonds with staggered maturities — no single year has an overwhelming repayment. Smart debt management.

Valuation Basics: Is the Price Right?

Everything above tells you about the company's quality. Valuation asks a different question: is the stock price fair for what you're getting?

P/E Ratio
~45x
Stock Price / Earnings Per Share
"I'm paying $45 for every $1 of current earnings." High P/E = market expects high growth.
EV/EBITDA
~25x
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
Compares total company value (including debt) to operating earnings. Useful for comparing companies with different capital structures.
P/S Ratio
~8x
Market Cap / Revenue
Useful for companies with no profit yet. "I'm paying $8 for every $1 of revenue."

"Expensive" vs. "cheap" is always relative to growth and quality. A company trading at 50x earnings but growing 40% per year might be cheaper than one at 10x earnings that's shrinking.

Bridge to the Advanced Series

These valuation basics are just the starting point. The 10-post Strategic Financial Analysis series covers DCF valuation, abnormal earnings models, multiples analysis, and real M&A case studies. If you've understood this post, you're ready for it.

Check Your Understanding
A company reports $500M in net income but only $50M in free cash flow. What's most likely happening?
The company is very profitable
Massive capital expenditures or working capital demands are consuming cash
Free cash flow doesn't matter if profit is high
$450M in cash is being consumed between net income and FCF. This could be heavy CapEx (investing in factories, content, infrastructure), inventory buildup, or slower customer payments. The $500M profit is real on paper, but only $50M is "free" for shareholders. This doesn't necessarily mean trouble — a company in heavy investment phase (like early Netflix) shows exactly this pattern. The question is: will the investment eventually generate FCF? If it's structural (the company always burns cash), that's a problem.
Part 7
The 6-Question Dashboard — The Analyst's Mental Model

Every company analysis, from a quick check to a deep dive, answers the same six questions. If you can answer these, you understand the company.

The 6 Questions Every Company Analysis Must Answer
1. Scale & Growth
How big is it, and how fast is it growing?
Revenue$33.7B
YoY Growth6.7%
Subscribers260M+
2. Profitability
Does it make money on what it sells?
Gross Margin42.5%
Operating Margin20.6%
Net Margin16.0%
3. Cash Generation
Does it generate real cash, or just paper profit?
OCF$7.3B
FCF$6.9B
FCF Margin20.5%
4. Investment Needs
How much must it reinvest to stay competitive?
Content Spend~$13B
CapEx$345M
R&D$2.7B
5. Funding & Risk
Is it funded safely, or living on debt?
D/E Ratio0.69x
Interest Coverage8.7x
Cash Balance$7.1B
6. Return to Owners
Are shareholders getting rewarded?
ROE26.3%
ROA11.1%
Buybacks$6.2B
Fill in these 6 boxes for any company, and you can tell 90% of the story without opening a spreadsheet.

Netflix in 5 Sentences

With the dashboard filled, here's how an analyst tells Netflix's story:

  1. Growth: "Revenue is growing at ~7% per year, driven by subscriber additions and price increases, with 260M+ subscribers globally."
  2. Profitability: "Gross margin is 42.5% and improving; operating margin is 20.6%, showing strong cost discipline after years of heavy content spending."
  3. Cash: "The business converts profit into cash effectively — OCF of $7.3B exceeds net income of $5.4B, producing $6.9B in free cash flow."
  4. Funding: "Funded by a mix of equity and moderate debt (D/E 0.69x), with 8.7x interest coverage — comfortable and improving as debt is paid down."
  5. Returns: "ROE of 26.3% and active share buybacks signal the company is now in 'harvest mode' — generating and returning cash rather than just reinvesting everything."

That's the entire story. Every ratio, every trend, every insight from this post — distilled into five sentences. If something looks off in the dashboard, then you dig into the details.

Practice Mode

Apply what you've learned to real analysis scenarios

0 / 5
Scenario 1 of 5
Company A: Gross Margin 75%, Operating Margin 8%, Net Margin 3%.
Company B: Gross Margin 35%, Operating Margin 18%, Net Margin 14%.
What can you infer about Company A?
A
Great product economics, but massive operating expenses are destroying profitability
B
Company A is clearly the better business
C
Company A must have more debt than Company B
Scenario 2 of 5
Year 1: Revenue $500M, Net Income $50M, OCF $60M, FCF $30M
Year 2: Revenue $600M, Net Income $70M, OCF $40M, FCF -$20M
What should concern you most about Year 2?
A
Nothing — revenue and profit both grew
B
Profit grew but cash flow collapsed — earnings quality deteriorated
C
The revenue growth rate slowed slightly
Scenario 3 of 5
You're analyzing a mature utility company: ROE 9%, D/E 2.5x, Interest Coverage 3.5x, Current Ratio 0.8x.
How do you interpret the low current ratio (0.8x)?
A
The company is about to go bankrupt
B
It's typical for utilities — they have stable cash flows and easy access to credit
C
It doesn't matter since ROE is positive
Scenario 4 of 5
Two competitors in the same industry:
Company P: ROE 30%, Margin 15%, Turnover 1.0x, Leverage 2.0x
Company Q: ROE 30%, Margin 10%, Turnover 1.5x, Leverage 2.0x
Both have 30% ROE. Which approach is more sustainable?
A
Company P — higher margins give more buffer against cost increases
B
Company Q — higher turnover means better operations
C
They're identical — same ROE means same quality
Scenario 5 of 5
You're building a quick dashboard for Company Z:
Revenue: $8B (up 12%), Net Margin: 18%, OCF: $2B, Net Income: $1.4B, D/E: 0.3x, ROE: 22%.
Using the 6-Question framework, what's the overall story?
A
Strong: good growth, profitable, cash exceeds profit, low debt, solid returns
B
Weak: only $8B in revenue is small
C
Can't tell without knowing the P/E ratio

Cheat Sheet: Financial Ratios & Analysis

Every ratio, formula, and benchmark from this post. Bookmark this.

Profitability Ratios
Gross Margin
Gross Profit / Revenue. Netflix: 42.5%. Is the product profitable?
Operating Margin
Operating Income / Revenue. Netflix: 20.6%. Is the business efficient?
Net Margin
Net Income / Revenue. Netflix: 16.0%. What actually stays after everything?
EBITDA
Net Income + Interest + Taxes + D&A. Useful for comparisons, but can hide real costs.
Efficiency & Return Ratios
Asset Turnover
Revenue / Total Assets. Netflix: 0.69x. Revenue per dollar of assets.
ROA
Net Income / Total Assets. Netflix: 11.1%. Profit per dollar of assets.
ROE
Net Income / Equity. Netflix: 26.3%. The shareholder return. ROE = Margin × Turnover × Leverage.
Working Capital
Current Assets − Current Liabilities. Netflix: $1.1B. Cash tied in day-to-day operations.
Liquidity & Leverage Ratios
Current Ratio
Current Assets / Current Liabilities. Netflix: 1.12x. Above 1.0 = can pay bills.
Debt-to-Equity
Total Debt / Equity. Netflix: 0.69x. Below 1.0 = conservative. Above 3.0 = watch out.
Interest Coverage
Operating Income / Interest. Netflix: 8.7x. Above 3x = comfortable. Below 1.5x = danger.
Net Debt / EBITDA
(Debt − Cash) / EBITDA. "Years to pay off debt." Below 2x = safe. Above 5x = risky.
Growth Metrics
YoY Growth
(This Year − Last Year) / Last Year. Netflix revenue: 6.7%. Simple annual growth.
CAGR
(End/Start)^(1/years) − 1. Netflix 5Y: ~10.8%. Smoothed compound growth rate.
Red Flags Checklist
Revenue Up, Cash Down
Revenue growing but OCF declining = aggressive accounting or collection problems.
Receivables > Revenue Growth
Customers paying slower or channel stuffing. Classic earnings quality warning.
Debt Rising, Assets Flat
Borrowing to cover losses, not invest. Path to bankruptcy.
OCF < Net Income (Persistently)
Low quality earnings. Profit not backed by cash. Investigate.
The 6-Question Dashboard
1. Scale & Growth
Revenue, growth rate, subscribers/users. How big and how fast?
2. Profitability
Gross, Operating, Net margins and trends. Does it make money?
3. Cash Generation
OCF, FCF, FCF margin. Real cash or paper profit?
4. Investment
CapEx, R&D, content spend. How much must it reinvest?
5. Funding & Risk
D/E, interest coverage, cash buffer. Safe or leveraged?
6. Returns
ROE, ROA, dividends/buybacks. Are owners rewarded?
Valuation Quick Reference
P/E Ratio
Price / EPS. How much you pay per dollar of earnings. High = growth expected.
EV/EBITDA
Enterprise Value / EBITDA. Compares total company value to operating earnings.
P/S Ratio
Market Cap / Revenue. Useful for unprofitable companies. How much per dollar of sales.
FCF Yield
FCF / Market Cap. The "real earnings yield." Higher = better value.