Two companies both report $10 billion in revenue and $1 billion in profit. Identical, right?
One is thriving — growing fast, generating cash, rewarding shareholders. The other is slowly dying — margins shrinking, debt piling up, cash bleeding out.
The only way to tell them apart: ratios.
In Post 1, you learned to read the three financial statements. Now you'll learn what the numbers mean — and how analysts spot the story behind them.
You already know Netflix's revenue ($33.7B) and net income ($5.4B) from Post 1. But what do those numbers mean? Is $5.4B in profit good? Bad? Average?
A number by itself is meaningless. $5.4 billion in profit sounds impressive — until you learn the company spent $33.7 billion to earn it. That's a 16% margin. But if a competitor earns $2 billion on $5 billion in revenue, their 40% margin tells a completely different story about their business model.
This is why ratios exist: they make numbers comparable across companies of different sizes, industries, and time periods.
The Margin Waterfall
Remember the waterfall from Post 1? Each level of margin tells you something different about the business:
EBITDA: The Controversial Metric
EBITDA stands for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. It strips out financing costs (interest), tax effects, and non-cash expenses (D&A) to show the "pure operating profit."
Management loves EBITDA because it makes profits look bigger (by adding back real costs). Investors use it carefully — it's useful for comparing companies with different debt levels or tax situations, but it can hide real problems. As Warren Buffett famously said: "Does management think the tooth fairy pays for capital expenditures?"
Useful: Comparing Netflix (lots of content amortization) to Disney+ (different accounting). EBITDA removes the accounting noise. Misleading: A company with massive capital expenditures reporting great EBITDA while burning cash. Always check EBITDA against FCF — if they diverge wildly, be skeptical.
Profitability tells you how much the company keeps. Return ratios tell you how well it uses what it has. A company could be highly profitable but terribly inefficient — sitting on mountains of assets that aren't generating much return.
Asset Turnover: Revenue Per Dollar of Assets
Asset turnover varies wildly by industry. A grocery store might have 3-4x turnover (thin margins, high volume). A pharmaceutical company might have 0.3x (huge asset base, high margins). Netflix at 0.69x is typical for a content-heavy tech company — they own a massive content library ($17.2B) that generates revenue over many years.
ROA: Return on Assets
ROE: Return on Equity
The ROE vs. ROA Gap: The Leverage Effect
Notice something? Netflix's ROE (26.3%) is more than double its ROA (11.1%). How can the return to shareholders be so much higher than the return on total assets?
The answer is leverage (debt). Netflix borrows money at a cost lower than the return its assets generate, so the extra return flows to shareholders. This amplification effect is captured by a famous formula:
This formula decomposes ROE into three drivers: how much profit the company makes (margin), how efficiently it uses assets (turnover), and how much debt it uses (leverage = Assets/Equity). The advanced finance series covers this in depth with the DuPont analysis post.
Beyond universal ratios, every industry has its own efficiency metrics:
- Subscription businesses (Netflix): ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) = Revenue / Subscribers. Netflix ARPU ~ $130/year. Tells you how well you monetize each customer.
- SaaS companies: CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) and LTV (Lifetime Value). LTV/CAC > 3x is generally healthy.
- Retail: Revenue per square foot, same-store sales growth.
- Manufacturing: Inventory turnover = COGS / Average Inventory. High turnover = efficient inventory management.
- Banks: Net Interest Margin = (Interest Earned - Interest Paid) / Average Assets. The core profitability measure for banks.
These industry-specific metrics often matter more than generic ratios for understanding how well a specific type of business is performing.
A company can be profitable and still go bankrupt. How? If it can't pay its bills when they come due. Profitability is about the long term. Liquidity is about surviving next month.
Current Ratio: The Quick Health Check
Netflix's current ratio is 1.12x — just above the comfort line. This is typical for subscription businesses that have predictable, recurring revenue. They don't need a huge buffer because next month's subscriber payments are highly reliable.
Debt-to-Equity: How Much Debt?
Netflix's D/E of 0.69x is moderate. Compare this to a few years ago when Netflix was borrowing aggressively for content — their D/E was well above 1.5x. The company has been systematically paying down debt as cash flow has improved.
Interest Coverage: Can They Afford the Debt?
Interest coverage of 8.7x means Netflix could see its operating income drop by 85% and still cover its interest payments. This is a very comfortable position.
Net Debt / EBITDA: How Many Years to Pay Off?
When Leverage Is Good vs. Dangerous
Debt isn't inherently bad. It's a tool. The question is whether the company uses it wisely:
- Borrowed to invest in growth that generates higher returns than the interest cost
- Stable, predictable cash flows to service debt
- D/E below 1.5x, interest coverage above 4x
- Netflix borrowing at 4-5% to build a content library generating 20%+ returns
- Borrowed to cover operating losses (not investment)
- Volatile cash flows make debt payments unpredictable
- D/E above 3x, interest coverage below 2x
- A cyclical company borrowing at the peak of its cycle
From 2015-2019, Netflix borrowed over $15 billion to fund its original content push. Wall Street was nervous — the company was profitable but cash-flow-negative. By 2023, the bet paid off: the content library was generating enough subscriber revenue to produce $6.9B in free cash flow, and Netflix began paying down debt. D/E dropped from ~1.8x to 0.69x. The debt was a strategic weapon, not reckless spending.
A company making $1 billion in profit is very different depending on whether that profit is growing 20% per year or shrinking 5% per year. Growth is the engine that makes everything else work — expanding margins, rising stock prices, and increasing returns.
Year-over-Year (YoY) Growth
YoY growth is the simplest growth metric. Netflix grew revenue 6.7% from 2022 to 2023. For a $33B company, that's another $2.1 billion in new revenue — impressive in absolute terms, but relatively modest for a "growth stock."
CAGR: The Compound Growth Rate
One year can be misleading. Maybe 2022 was a bad year, or 2023 had a one-time boost. CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) smooths the picture over multiple years:
Netflix's 5-year revenue CAGR of ~10.8% tells a more stable story than any single year's growth rate. It means Netflix's revenue has been growing at roughly 10.8% per year, compounding, over the past 5 years.
Revenue Growth vs. Earnings Growth
Both matter, but they tell different stories:
The best companies grow both. A company growing revenue 20% while earnings grow 30% is becoming more efficient at scale — that's operating leverage, and it's one of the most powerful forces in business.
A single number is a fact. A trend is a story. One year of 20% margin tells you almost nothing. Five years of margins rising from 10% to 20% tells you the business is improving. Five years of margins falling from 30% to 20% tells you something is going wrong.
This is where financial analysis stops being math and starts being detective work.
What Good Trends Look Like
- Expanding margins: Revenue growing faster than costs = the business is becoming more efficient at scale
- Growing FCF: The company generates more actual cash each year
- Declining debt: The company is getting stronger and less risky
- Rising ROE: Shareholders are getting better returns over time
Benchmarking: Numbers Need Context
Netflix's 16% net margin — is that good? You can't answer that without comparing to something:
| Company | Net Margin | ROE | D/E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Netflix | 16.0% | 26.3% | 0.69x |
| Streaming Industry Average | ~5-10% | ~10-15% | varies |
| Benchmark | Well above average | Well above average | Moderate |
Netflix's 16% net margin looks even better when you know most streaming competitors are barely profitable (or losing money). Context transforms a number into an insight.
Red Flags: Warning Signs in Financials
Experienced analysts look for specific patterns that signal trouble ahead. Here are the most important:
Quality of Earnings: Is Profit Real?
The ultimate test: Does Operating Cash Flow exceed Net Income?
Netflix's OCF ($7.3B) exceeds Net Income ($5.4B). The earnings are high quality — every dollar of profit is backed by more than a dollar of actual cash. When you see the opposite pattern (high profit, low cash flow), dig deeper.
The ratios from Parts 1-5 will handle 80% of your analysis needs. But there are a few deeper concepts that separate a competent analyst from a good one.
Working Capital: Cash Trapped in Operations
Working capital is the cash tied up in the day-to-day cycle of business: money sitting in receivables (customers haven't paid yet), inventory (products waiting to sell), minus payables (bills you haven't paid yet).
A growing business often needs more working capital — more inventory, more receivables. This is called a "working capital investment" and it absorbs cash. A company that manages working capital efficiently (getting paid fast, paying suppliers slowly) frees up cash for other uses.
Free Cash Flow Mastery
We introduced FCF in Post 1. Now let's understand why it's the metric that serious investors care about most:
FCF represents the cash available after maintaining and growing the business. It can be used to:
- Pay down debt — reducing risk
- Buy back shares — increasing per-share value
- Pay dividends — returning cash to shareholders
- Make acquisitions — buying growth
- Build a cash reserve — insuring against uncertainty
Buffett famously focuses on "owner earnings" — his version of free cash flow. His reasoning:
- Net income can be manipulated through accounting choices (depreciation methods, revenue recognition timing, one-time charges). FCF is harder to fake — cash either moved or it didn't.
- CapEx is real: A company must maintain its assets to stay competitive. Ignoring CapEx (as EBITDA does) pretends these costs don't exist.
- FCF is what you can actually distribute: Dividends, buybacks, and debt repayment all come from FCF, not net income.
Netflix's 20.5% FCF margin means that for every $100 in revenue, $20.50 becomes truly free cash. Buffett would compare this to the company's reinvestment needs — if FCF margin is high and stable, the business generates "owner earnings" that compound over time.
Debt Analysis: Beyond the Ratios
D/E and interest coverage give you the big picture. But debt has nuances:
- Maturity schedule: When is debt due? A company with $10B in debt due in 10 years is very different from one with $10B due next year.
- Fixed vs. variable rate: Fixed-rate debt is predictable. Variable-rate debt gets more expensive when interest rates rise.
- Refinancing risk: If a company needs to refinance (borrow new to pay old) during a credit crunch, rates may be much higher. This risk killed many companies in 2008.
Netflix's debt is mostly long-term bonds with staggered maturities — no single year has an overwhelming repayment. Smart debt management.
Valuation Basics: Is the Price Right?
Everything above tells you about the company's quality. Valuation asks a different question: is the stock price fair for what you're getting?
"Expensive" vs. "cheap" is always relative to growth and quality. A company trading at 50x earnings but growing 40% per year might be cheaper than one at 10x earnings that's shrinking.
These valuation basics are just the starting point. The 10-post Strategic Financial Analysis series covers DCF valuation, abnormal earnings models, multiples analysis, and real M&A case studies. If you've understood this post, you're ready for it.
Every company analysis, from a quick check to a deep dive, answers the same six questions. If you can answer these, you understand the company.
Netflix in 5 Sentences
With the dashboard filled, here's how an analyst tells Netflix's story:
- Growth: "Revenue is growing at ~7% per year, driven by subscriber additions and price increases, with 260M+ subscribers globally."
- Profitability: "Gross margin is 42.5% and improving; operating margin is 20.6%, showing strong cost discipline after years of heavy content spending."
- Cash: "The business converts profit into cash effectively — OCF of $7.3B exceeds net income of $5.4B, producing $6.9B in free cash flow."
- Funding: "Funded by a mix of equity and moderate debt (D/E 0.69x), with 8.7x interest coverage — comfortable and improving as debt is paid down."
- Returns: "ROE of 26.3% and active share buybacks signal the company is now in 'harvest mode' — generating and returning cash rather than just reinvesting everything."
That's the entire story. Every ratio, every trend, every insight from this post — distilled into five sentences. If something looks off in the dashboard, then you dig into the details.
Practice Mode
Apply what you've learned to real analysis scenarios
Company B: Gross Margin 35%, Operating Margin 18%, Net Margin 14%.
Year 2: Revenue $600M, Net Income $70M, OCF $40M, FCF -$20M
Company P: ROE 30%, Margin 15%, Turnover 1.0x, Leverage 2.0x
Company Q: ROE 30%, Margin 10%, Turnover 1.5x, Leverage 2.0x
Revenue: $8B (up 12%), Net Margin: 18%, OCF: $2B, Net Income: $1.4B, D/E: 0.3x, ROE: 22%.
Cheat Sheet: Financial Ratios & Analysis
Every ratio, formula, and benchmark from this post. Bookmark this.
What's Next
You now have the full foundations toolkit. Ready for the advanced series?
Stay Updated
Get notified when new finance and tech posts are published