Disruptive Strategy

Jobs to Be Done: Why Customers Don't Buy Products

A fast food chain spent millions improving its milkshakes. Surveys, focus groups, recipe tweaks. Nothing worked. Then one researcher asked a question nobody had thought to ask — and everything changed.

Bahgat
Bahgat
Feb 7, 2026
| ~30 min read
Why do customers buy?
Product View: "Milkshakes" 75% Fail
Demographics: "Males 18-35" Correlation
Job: "Help me survive my commute" Causality

In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

A major fast food chain spent millions trying to sell more milkshakes. They surveyed customers, improved the recipe, added flavors, ran promotions. Nothing worked. Sales didn't budge.

Then a researcher stood in the restaurant for 18 hours and asked one question nobody had thought to ask.

Not "how can we make this milkshake better?" but "what job did you hire this milkshake to do?"

That single question changed everything — and it will change how you think about your own products forever.

Quick Summary
  • Customers don't buy products — they hire them to get a job done
  • 75-85% of new products fail because companies focus on who buys (correlation) instead of why they buy (causality)
  • Once you know the job, your real competitors, market size, and innovation opportunities all become obvious
This post is for you if...
  • You've launched products that customers said they wanted — but then didn't buy
  • You segment customers by age, income, or geography — and wonder why marketing doesn't work
  • You've read The Three Types of Innovation and want the next lens in the disruption toolkit
Part 1
The 75% Problem — Why Most Products Fail

The Billion-Dollar Guessing Game

Imagine you're hiring someone for a critical role at your company. You have two approaches:

Approach A: Look at their age, gender, where they live, and how much money they make. Then guess if they'd be good at the job.

Approach B: Define exactly what job needs doing, then find the person whose skills match.

Approach A sounds absurd, right? Nobody hires employees based on demographics. But here's the thing — this is exactly how most companies think about their customers.

"Our target market is males 18-35 who earn $50K-$80K and live in urban areas." Sound familiar? That's Approach A applied to product development. And it explains why 75-85% of new products fail.

Not because the products are bad. Not because the teams are incompetent. But because they're asking the wrong question. They're asking "who is our customer?" when they should be asking "what job is our customer trying to get done?"

Correlation vs Causality: The History of Flight

To understand why this matters, let's go back to one of humanity's oldest dreams — flying.

For centuries, people watched birds and made what seemed like an obvious observation: birds have wings and feathers, and birds fly. So they concluded: wings + feathers = flight.

They strapped wings to their arms. They glued on feathers. They climbed to the top of cathedrals and jumped, flapping as hard as they could.

It never worked. People died trying.

And if they'd looked more carefully, they would have noticed the correlation wasn't even reliable. Ostriches have wings and feathers — and they can't fly. Bats have wings but no feathers — and they fly perfectly well. Flying squirrels have no wings or feathers at all — and they get by just fine.

The pattern was everywhere, and it was wrong everywhere too. Wings and feathers were correlated with flight — you could observe them together. But they didn't cause flight.

Then Daniel Bernoulli did something different. Instead of cataloging the attributes of things that fly, he studied the mechanism. He discovered the airfoil — a specific shape that creates lift by making air move faster over the top surface than the bottom. That was the causal mechanism.

Once engineers understood the actual cause, two incredible things happened:

  1. They could build machines that flew — even without feathers, even without flapping wings. Because they understood the mechanism, not just the correlation.
  2. When planes crashed, they could figure out why — "What was it about that specific situation that caused the mechanism to fail?" This led to if-then rules: if the angle of attack exceeds 15 degrees, then the wing stalls. Flight became predictable.

This is exactly where business stands today. Looking at customer demographics — age, gender, income, geography — is like looking at wings and feathers. These attributes are correlated with buying behavior, yes. But they don't cause anyone to buy anything.

The Key Insight

No demographic attribute has ever caused someone to buy a product. People buy because a job arises in their life, and they look for something to hire to get it done. Understanding that job is the causal mechanism of business.

Correlation vs Causality — Three Views of the Same Market
Market Product View Customer Attributes
(Correlation)
Job to Be Done
(Causality)
Newspapers Print & digital subscriptions Intellectuals age 60+ "Help me stay informed about the world"
Milkshakes Frozen dairy beverages Males age 18-35 "Help me survive a long, boring commute"
Theme Parks Rides & attractions Families with small children "Help me escape reality into a storytelling experience with my family"
The product view tells you what you sell. Demographics tell you who buys. Only the job tells you why they buy — and that's what drives innovation.
Pause & Think
A company sells protein bars. Their data shows 80% of buyers are men aged 25-40 who go to the gym. They design marketing targeting "gym-going men." Sales are flat. What went wrong?
A
Targeting too narrow — they need a wider demographic
B
They found correlation, not causality — they don't know the JOB
C
They need better ads and bigger marketing budget
Exactly right!

Demographics (gym-going men) are correlated with buying protein bars but don't cause the purchase. The JOB might be "help me get quick energy between meetings" or "help me feel like I'm making progress on my health goals." Each job requires a completely different product and marketing strategy.

Not quite

The problem isn't the width of targeting or the ad budget — it's that demographics tell you WHO buys but not WHY they buy. The job to be done is the causal mechanism. Without it, any marketing is guesswork.

Part 2
The Milkshake Story — Finding the Real Job

"None of My Attributes Caused Me to Buy a Newspaper"

Clay Christensen — the Harvard professor who developed this theory — liked to make the point personal:

"I'm Clay Christensen. I'm 6 feet 8 inches tall, 62 years old, married for 38 years. I live in the suburbs of Boston. I drive a Honda minivan to work. I have a lot of attributes and characteristics. But none of those things caused me to go out and buy the New York Times today."

What caused the purchase was this: a job arose in his life. He needed to fill time while waiting at an airport. He looked around for something to hire for that job, and the New York Times got the interview.

The demographics — his age, height, income, education — are all correlated with buying the Times. But they didn't cause it. The job did.

The Milkshake Mystery

A major fast food chain wanted to sell more milkshakes. They did what any reasonable company would do — they brought in the quintessential milkshake customer and asked what they wanted.

"Should we make it chunkier? More chocolatey? Cheaper? Bigger?" Customers gave clear, thoughtful answers. The company implemented every suggestion. And... nothing happened. Sales didn't budge.

Then a researcher tried something different. He stood inside the restaurant for 18 hours. He recorded every milkshake sale — who bought it, when, what else they bought, whether they were alone or with someone.

What he found was startling: nearly half of all milkshakes were sold before 8:30 AM. The customers were almost always alone. They always drove off with the milkshake. And it was usually the only thing they bought.

The next morning, the researcher confronted these customers as they left with their milkshakes:

"Excuse me — what JOB were you trying to get done when you came here at 6:30 in the morning to hire this milkshake?"

They struggled to answer at first. So he asked a different way: "Think about the last time you were in this same situation — long boring commute ahead of you — but you DIDN'T hire a milkshake. What did you hire instead?"

Now they could answer. And the answers were fascinating:

The milkshake won the job interview every time. Here's why: it was thick and viscous, so it took 23 minutes to suck up through a thin straw. It kept one hand busy and the mind engaged during a boring commute. And it sat heavy in the stomach — not hungry until noon.

The Job

"I have a long, boring commute ahead of me. I need something to keep one hand busy, make the drive more interesting, and hold off hunger until lunch." That's why they hired the milkshake.

The Milkshake's Real Competitors (From the Customer's Perspective)
🍌
Banana
Gone in 60 seconds. Hungry by 7:30.
🍩
Donut
Crumbs everywhere. Gooey fingers. Gone fast.
🥤
Milkshake
23 min through thin straw. Full until noon.
🥯
Bagel
Dry. Needs two hands. Three problems, two hands.
🍫
Snickers
Guilt. Never hired again.
The milkshake's competitors aren't other milkshakes. They're bananas, donuts, bagels, and Snickers bars — anything else hired for the same job.

Once You Know the Job, Innovation Becomes Obvious

Now that you know the job, think about how you'd improve the milkshake for morning commuters:

Notice how different these improvements are from "make it more chocolatey" or "lower the price" — the answers the focus group gave. When you know the job, the right innovations become obvious.

And here's another insight: how big is the milkshake market? If you measure it by milkshake sales (McDonald's + Burger King + Wendy's), it looks like one number. But if you measure by the job — "help me survive a boring commute" — the market is enormously bigger. Every banana, donut, bagel, and Snickers bar sold to a morning commuter is part of your actual market.

Is the market "mature" or "growing"? That question is meaningless until you know the job. Once you do, the answer becomes clear: there's massive growth potential.

What a Job to Be Done Actually Is

Let's be precise about what we mean by a "job to be done":

A job is a problem or opportunity someone is trying to solve or address in their life. When a job arises, people look around for something to hire to get it done.

Jobs to be done statements typically start with:

Critically, jobs are NOT adjectives or adverbs. "Low cost" is not a job — it's an attribute of a solution. "Convenient" is not a job. "Fast" is not a job. These describe HOW something gets a job done, not WHAT job needs doing.

The Resume Analogy

When you hire an employee, you read their resume to see if they can do the JOB. Customers do the same thing with products. They figuratively "read the product's resume" — its features, price, availability — to see if it can do the job they need done. If your product's resume doesn't match the job, it doesn't get hired.

Here's the most important implication: if you define your business by your product, you live in an unpredictable, chaotic world where competitors come from nowhere and customers leave for no apparent reason. But if you define your business by the job, you get clarity, stability, and predictability.

How Chobani Built a $2.6 Billion Business in a "Mature" Market

Everyone said the yogurt market was "mature." The big players — Yoplait, Dannon — had been competing for years. Growth was flat. Case closed, right?

Then Chobani found a job: "Help me maintain a healthy, protein-rich diet." They created Greek yogurt with twice the protein and half the sugar and carbs of traditional yogurt.

The results were staggering:

  • Greek yogurt grew from $391 million to $2.6 billion in just 3 years
  • Meanwhile, traditional yogurt shrank from $4.4 billion to $3.6 billion
  • Chobani didn't just take share from existing yogurt — they drew in people who never ate yogurt at all

A "mature" market doesn't exist. There are only mature products. When you find a new job, the market can explode — even in a category everyone had written off as saturated.

Pause & Think
From the customer's perspective, Chobani's real competitors are...
A
Other yogurt brands (Yoplait, Dannon)
B
Protein bars, nuts, eggs, meal replacement shakes
C
Snack foods in general
You're thinking in jobs!

The job is "help me maintain a healthy, protein-rich diet." Anything hired for that same job is a competitor — protein bars, nuts, hard-boiled eggs, meal replacement shakes. Other yogurt brands aren't the main competition because they're hired for a different job (often "give me a sweet snack").

Think about the job

The job Chobani is hired to do is "help me maintain a healthy, protein-rich diet." Its real competitors are anything else people hire for that same job — protein bars, nuts, eggs, shakes. Not other yogurts (different job) or snack foods in general (too broad to be useful).

Part 3
Jobs Persist, Products Don't — The Two Dimensions

Julius Caesar Had the Same Job as You

Here's a thought experiment that changes how you see business forever:

The job: "I need to get this information from here to there, with perfect certainty, as fast as possible."

That job has existed for over 2,000 years. But look at how the products hired to do it have changed:

The job hasn't changed in 2,000 years. Every single product hired to do it has changed completely — many of them don't even exist anymore.

This is the most important strategic insight in the whole framework: if you frame your business around a product, you will get supplanted. Telegraph companies died. Pony Express riders lost their jobs. The railroad's dominance faded. But the job is still here.

If you frame your business around the job, you see every new technology as an opportunity, not a threat. You don't fight to protect your product — you race to find a better way to get the job done.

The Afternoon Milkshake — Same Product, Different Job

Remember the milkshake? There's a second half to the story that reveals something crucial.

Clay Christensen took his son Spencer to a fast food restaurant after school one day. Spencer looked at the menu and said, "Dad, can I have a milkshake?"

Clay — being a good father — said yes. And then watched as Spencer sat there... and sat there... taking forever to finish it. The milkshake was thick. It took ages through the thin straw. Finally Clay said, "Spencer, we don't have time for this" — and threw away the half-consumed milkshake.

Wait. The same product that was perfect for the morning commute job was terrible for the afternoon job. Why?

Because the job was completely different:

Critical Insight

One product optimized for one job will suboptimize for another. The morning milkshake and the afternoon milkshake need to be different products — even though they share the same name. Morning: thicker, longer, more engaging. Afternoon: thinner, smaller, faster. This is why understanding the job matters more than understanding the product.

Functional, Emotional, and Social Jobs

Every job to be done has two dimensions, and understanding both is critical:

Functional dimension: The practical problem being solved. "Help me be clean-shaven." "Help me get from home to work."

Emotional and social dimension: How using the product makes you feel, and how it makes others see you. "Help me feel like I belong to an exclusive group." "Help me show the world I've made it."

Most products serve BOTH dimensions — but usually one dominates:

The Two Dimensions of Every Job
Functional
Emotional / Social
Razor Blades
"Help me be clean-shaven"
Mostly Functional
Milkshake (AM)
"Survive my commute"
Functional + Some Emotional
Smartphone
"Stay connected + status"
Both Dimensions
Milkshake (PM)
"Feel like a good dad"
Mostly Emotional
Perfume
"Help me feel exclusive"
Mostly Emotional/Social
Every product serves both functional and emotional/social dimensions — but one usually dominates. The same product (milkshake) can sit in different positions depending on the job.
High-End vs Low-End: Different Jobs for Different Dimensions

Think about the same product category at different price points:

  • High-end watches (Rolex, Patek Philippe) — the job is dominated by emotional/social dimensions: "Help me signal success and taste." The functional job (telling time) is trivially easy for any watch.
  • Low-end watches (Casio, Timex) — the job is dominated by function: "Help me know the time reliably and cheaply."

Same category. Completely different jobs. This is why competing on "features" misses the point — a Casio with more features won't steal Rolex customers, and a cheaper Rolex won't attract Casio customers. They're hired for fundamentally different jobs.

Part 4
Disney — A Masterclass in Jobs to Be Done

A Merry-Go-Round and a Father's Insight

In the early 1950s, Walt Disney took his two young daughters to a small amusement park in Los Angeles. While his kids rode the merry-go-round, Walt sat on a bench to the side, watching.

And in that moment, he had an insight that would create one of the most successful businesses in history.

He realized: "We just need occasionally to go away from where we live and immerse ourselves in a fantasy together — an experience we would remember for the rest of our lives."

He looked around Southern California — the beaches, the parks, the mountains. Nothing was designed around that job. There were amusement parks with rides. There were beaches with sand. But nothing that said: "Come here, leave reality behind, and step into a story with your family."

The job: "Help me escape reality into a storytelling experience with my family."

How Disney Integrated Around the Job

What Disney built was extraordinary — not because of the technology or the rides, but because of the integration around the job:

But the genius was in the details of the experience:

Disney's Integration Stack — How Every Layer Serves the Job
Purpose Brand
"Disneyland" — the name instantly means "family fantasy escape"
Integration
Walls, Main Street, themed lands, live characters, castle, no outside world visible
Experience
Step into the story. Characters are real. You're not a spectator — you're living the fantasy.
Job to Be Done
"Help me escape reality into a storytelling experience with my family"
Each layer delivers something required by the layer below it. The job defines what experience is needed. The experience defines what must be integrated. Integration creates the brand. This is why nobody could compete with Disney for 40 years.

The result: nobody could compete with Disney for four decades. Not because of secrets. Not because of proprietary technology. Not because of patents. But because of integration around the job. You can copy a ride. You can't copy an integrated system designed from the ground up to nail a specific job.

And here's the remarkable thing — that job hasn't changed. As Clay put it: "I'm 62 years old, unfortunately. But as I was growing up, our family had that job to be done. As I was raising our children, we had the same job to be done. And now our children have children, and they have the same job to be done." Julius Caesar probably had that job. Abraham Lincoln had it too.

Because the job is so stable over time, it becomes a kind of North Star for innovation. Anything that helps families escape into a storytelling experience together — invest in it. Anything that doesn't serve that job — cut it. Without a clear job to focus on, innovation feels unpredictable. With one, every decision has a compass.

Who Are Disney's REAL Competitors?

From the product view, Disney's competitors are other theme parks — Six Flags, Universal Studios, Cedar Point.

But from the job perspective? Disney's real competitors are:

  • A family camping trip in the mountains
  • A beach vacation
  • A ski trip
  • Even a really good family board game night

Anything that gets the job done — "help me escape reality and create a memorable experience with my family" — is a competitor. This is the same pattern as the milkshake: the competition is never who you think it is.

Clay Christensen used another example: Black & Decker power tools. From the product view, the competitor is Craftsman or DeWalt. But from the job view, if someone is buying a Black & Decker drill as a wedding gift, the real competitors are a necktie and a toaster.

The $1 Billion Mistake: California Adventure

In 1998, Disney's management made a decision that perfectly illustrates what happens when you abandon jobs-to-be-done thinking.

They wanted to turn Southern California into a multi-day destination. More days = more hotel revenue. So they built a second park right next door to Disneyland: Disney California Adventure.

But instead of building another place designed around the family fantasy job, they went after a different demographic: teenagers and thrill-seekers. They built California Screamin' (a roller coaster), Hollywood Tower of Terror, and marketed it as "Disneyland's hipper, edgier younger sibling."

The result was devastating:

They spent $1 billion building a park that failed — not because the rides were bad, but because they abandoned the job. They tried to serve a different demographic (thrill-seeking teenagers) instead of doubling down on the job that made Disney unbeatable (family fantasy escape).

Bob Iger's $1.1 Billion Fix

In 2007, CEO Bob Iger made a bold decision. He called the park a "brand withdrawal" and committed $1.1 billion over five years to fix it.

The fix? Return to the job.

This wasn't copying an old strategy. The job hadn't changed. "Help me escape reality into a storytelling experience with my family" was the same job Walt identified on that bench in the 1950s. Iger just found better ways to get it done — with new characters and new stories.

The result? Success. Because when you return to the job, the customers return too.

Pause & Think
California Adventure failed because...
A
The rides weren't exciting enough
B
They didn't spend enough on marketing
C
They abandoned the job to be done and chased a different demographic
D
Teenagers are a bad market
That's the lesson!

Disney's magic came from integration around a specific job: "Help me escape reality into a storytelling experience with my family." California Adventure abandoned that job and tried to serve a different demographic (thrill-seekers). The rides were fine. The marketing was fine. The JOB was wrong.

Think about the job

The rides and marketing were adequate. The problem was that management abandoned the job to be done — the family fantasy escape that made Disney unbeatable — and instead chased demographics (teenagers, thrill-seekers). When Iger returned to the job, the park succeeded.

Part 5
The Jobs to Be Done Pyramid

The Architecture That Makes Companies Unbeatable

You've now seen the Disney integration stack in action. That stack is actually a universal framework — the Jobs to Be Done Pyramid — that explains why some companies become virtually impossible to compete with.

The pyramid has four layers, built from the bottom up:

The Jobs to Be Done Pyramid
4
Purpose Brand
A brand customers immediately think to "hire" for this job
3
Integration
What and how must we integrate to deliver those experiences?
2
Experience
What experiences in purchase and use must we provide?
1
Job to Be Done
What problem is the customer trying to solve?
Start at the bottom: define the job. Then work upward — what experience does that job require? What integration delivers that experience? What brand makes customers think of you first?

IKEA — 50 Years, Zero Competitors

Clay Christensen's son Michael got accepted to a PhD program at Stanford. He called his dad, excited: "I found the apartment. I need to furnish it — tomorrow."

When you hear that job — "I need to furnish my home today" — what company pops into your head instantly?

IKEA.

Think about what IKEA integrated around that job:

IKEA has been rolling out worldwide for 50 years. No competitors. Not because of patents or technology or secrets — IKEA's founder became the 3rd richest person in the world. The reason nobody can compete is integration around the job.

Competitors can copy any individual product. Anyone can make cheap furniture. But you can't copy the way IKEA is organized — the store layout + flat-pack + take-home-today + room displays + restaurant + play area. All of these are experiences that nail the job. Copying ONE piece doesn't work. You need all of them, working together.

Why Can't Anyone Copy IKEA?

This is the deepest lesson in the JTBD framework: integration is the real moat.

A competitor could build cheap furniture. Another could offer flat-packs. Another could have a nice showroom. But the JTBD Pyramid shows why this doesn't work:

  • The job ("furnish my home today") requires a specific experience (see it, buy it, take it, assemble it — all in one trip)
  • That experience requires specific integration (warehouse in-store, flat-pack design, room displays, food to keep you going)
  • All of that creates a purpose brand — "IKEA" means "furnish fast" the way "Google" means "search"

You can't copy one layer. The layers depend on each other. This is exactly what made Disney unbeatable for 40 years, and it's what makes IKEA unbeatable for 50.

5 Ways to Find Jobs to Be Done

The million-dollar question: how do you actually find jobs to be done? Here are five methods, drawn from the most successful innovators in history:

5 Lenses for Finding Jobs to Be Done
Observe Yourself
"Why am I doing what I'm doing?" Sony's Morita, Walt Disney, Steve Jobs — all started here.
Current Customers
Why do they buy? When they don't buy yours, what do they buy instead?
Former Customers
They don't send an email. They just leave. Find out what they hired instead.
Non-Customers
Who has the job but can't hire anything? That's where new markets hide.
Compensating Behaviors
People doing workarounds = unmet jobs. This is where innovation hides.

Method 5 deserves special attention. Compensating behaviors are when people cobble together awkward workarounds because nothing good exists to hire for their job.

Here's a classic example: before OpenTable existed, coordinating dinner with four friends meant calling restaurants, getting availability, calling friends back, someone couldn't make Tuesday, calling the restaurant again, trying Thursday, calling friends again, one person doesn't answer, leaving a voicemail, waiting, calling back...

All that back-and-forth was a compensating behavior — a painful workaround for the job "help me coordinate a group dinner easily." OpenTable saw those workarounds and built a product that got the job done. Whenever you see people doing ridiculous workarounds, there's a job to be done hiding in plain sight.

Pause & Think
Your company makes project management software. You notice some customers are pasting meal plans into tasks, using projects for grocery lists. What is this a signal of?
A
They're confused about how to use the product
B
A compensating behavior — there's a job to be done that doesn't have a good tool
C
They're using the free tier and should be upsold
You spotted the compensating behavior!

When people use your product in unexpected ways, they're doing workarounds for a job that nothing serves well. "Help me plan and organize meals for the week" is a real job — and these customers are telling you it exists by their compensating behavior. This is where innovation opportunities hide.

Look deeper

They're not confused and this isn't about pricing tiers. When customers use a product in unexpected ways, it's a signal of a compensating behavior — a workaround for a job that nothing else serves well. These customers need a meal planning tool, and they're hacking your PM software because nothing better exists for that job.

Part 6
Minute Clinic — The Job Nobody Wanted to Admit

The Earache That Changed Healthcare

A busy working mom in Minneapolis wakes up to her youngest daughter crying with an earache. Mom takes out her otoscope (she's seen this before), looks in the ear, and sees it's pink.

She knows it's an earache. She's seen several. So she calls the doctor:

"Trust me — I've seen earaches. Can you just call in amoxicillin to the pharmacy?"

Doctor: "I have to see her."

"When can we come in?"

"Wednesday."

It's Monday.

"She's in pain!"

"Come in at 2 PM. I'll try to work you in."

So this mom leaves work in the middle of the day, picks up her daughter from school, drives to the doctor's office, and waits two hours.

Finally, the doctor calls them in. He looks in the daughter's ear for fifteen seconds and says:

"She has an earache."

The mom already knew that. The entire system — the appointment, the wait, the two-hour delay — existed not to diagnose the problem (the mom already knew the answer) but to fulfill a process designed around the doctor's needs, not the patient's.

The Job

"I know what's wrong. I just need the solution. Help me get my child's prescription and get on with my life — without seeing a doctor."

Designing Around the Job

Minute Clinic was built specifically around this job, with two brilliant design principles:

  1. Only diseases with YES/NO answers. Earache? Yes/No. Strep throat? Yes/No. Pink eye? Yes/No. If the answer is "maybe" — go see a doctor. No ambiguity. No gray areas.
  2. Response every 5 minutes. You walk in. Within 5 minutes, a nurse practitioner sees you. No appointment. No unpredictable waiting. Every 5 minutes, predictable progress.

Nurse practitioners — not doctors — staff these clinics. They can do almost everything a doctor does for simple, clear-cut conditions. And they cost a fraction of a doctor's time.

Now look at Minute Clinic through the JTBD Pyramid:

Traditional Doctor vs. Minute Clinic
Traditional Doctor Visit
  1. Call doctor's office
  2. Wait 1-2 days for appointment
  3. Leave work, pick up child from school
  4. Drive to doctor's office
  5. Wait 1-2 hours in waiting room
  6. 15 seconds with doctor
  7. Drive to pharmacy
  8. Wait for prescription to be filled
Total: 2 days + half a workday
Minute Clinic
  1. Walk into CVS (already there for groceries)
  2. Check in at Minute Clinic desk
  3. 5 minutes: nurse practitioner sees you
  4. Clear diagnosis (yes/no only)
  5. Prescription written on the spot
  6. Walk 20 steps to pharmacy
  7. Prescription filled immediately
  8. Done.
Total: 15-20 minutes
Same job. Same outcome (antibiotic for earache). The difference: 2 days + half a workday vs. 15 minutes. That's what happens when you design around the job.
How to Write a Good "Job to Be Done" Statement

A good JTBD statement:

  • Starts with "Help me..." or "Help me avoid..." or "I need to..."
  • Describes the problem, not the product
  • Is stable over time — the job existed before your product and will exist after
  • Is NOT an adjective (cheap, convenient, fast — those are attributes of solutions, not jobs)

Good examples:

  • "Help me stay informed about the world"
  • "Help me escape reality into a storytelling experience with my family"
  • "Help me get healthcare without seeing a doctor"
  • "Help me furnish my home today"

Bad examples:

  • "I want a cheaper fridge" — that's a product attribute, not a job
  • "I need a faster computer" — that's a solution spec, not a problem
  • "I want convenient food" — "convenient" is an adjective, not a job

And this brings us full circle to where we started. One of the most important dimensions of the Jobs to Be Done concept is this: what causes you to buy a product or use a service is not that you belong to a particular demographic. What causes people to walk into a Minute Clinic is not that they're in a demographic with a propensity to need healthcare. They go when they have a job to do — an earache at 9pm, a sore throat before a flight, a child with a fever on a Sunday.

Demographics don't cause purchases. Jobs do. And once you see that, you can't unsee it.

Part 7
Putting It All Together

What To Do Monday

If you're building a new product

  • Don't start with "what should we build?" Start with "what job is out there that nobody does well?"
  • Go observe. Talk to people. Watch for compensating behaviors — people doing painful workarounds.
  • Once you find the job, build the pyramid: Job → Experience → Integration → Brand

If you have an existing product

  • Ask: "What job is our product actually being hired to do?" — it may surprise you
  • Find the customers who left — what did they hire instead?
  • Look for customers using your product in unexpected ways — those compensating behaviors are job signals

For everyone

  • Remember: your competitors from the customer's perspective are not who you think
  • Segment by job, not demographics
  • Frame your business around the job — it won't become obsolete. Products do, jobs don't.

Key Takeaways

  1. Customers don't buy products — they hire them to get a job done
  2. Correlation ≠ Causality — Demographics correlate with purchases but don't cause them. The job is the causal mechanism.
  3. Jobs persist, products don't — The job of "get information from here to there fast" hasn't changed in 2000 years. Products hired for it have changed completely.
  4. Your real competitors surprise you — Milkshakes compete against bananas and donuts. Disney competes against family camping trips.
  5. The JTBD Pyramid — Job → Experience → Integration → Purpose Brand. Integration around the job is what makes Disney and IKEA unbeatable.
  6. Find jobs by observing — yourself, current customers, former customers, non-customers, and compensating behaviors.

Practice Mode

4 real-world scenarios. Can you spot the job — and avoid the product-thinking trap?

Scenario 1 of 4
You run a coffee shop chain. Data shows your biggest customers are professionals aged 25-45. You're about to launch a premium single-origin line targeting "coffee enthusiasts." Before you do — you observe your morning customers. What should you look for?
A
Which beans they prefer so you can optimize the single-origin selection
B
What JOB they're hiring the coffee to do — is it about taste, or about having a comfortable "third place" to work from?
C
Their willingness to pay more for premium products
Scenario 2 of 4
Your online education platform has great courses, but completion rates are 8%. You survey users — they say they want shorter videos and better UI. What should you ACTUALLY investigate?
A
Redesign the UI as users requested — they said what they want
B
Find the JOB students are hiring the platform to do — is it "help me learn a skill" or "help me get a credential for a promotion"?
C
Make all videos under 5 minutes to match attention spans
Scenario 3 of 4
Your fitness app tracks workouts and nutrition. You notice 40% of users only use the "log meal" feature and never touch workouts. What does this signal?
A
Users are lazy and need motivation features to start working out
B
The meal-logging users have a DIFFERENT job to be done — they may need a separate product (like afternoon milkshake vs morning milkshake)
C
Remove the meal feature and focus on workouts — that's your core product
Scenario 4 of 4
You sell enterprise CRM software. Small businesses (under 20 employees) keep asking for a free trial, trying it, and leaving. They say your product is "too complex." What should you do?
A
Add a "simple mode" to your existing CRM for smaller businesses
B
Study those small businesses — what JOB are they trying to get done? They may need a separate, simpler product. Watch for their compensating behaviors (spreadsheets + sticky notes).
C
Ignore them — focus on enterprise where margins are better
Jobs to Be Done — Cheat Sheet
Everything from this post on one screen. Bookmark this.
The Core Theory
  • Customers hire products to get a job done
  • Correlation ≠ Causality — demographics don't cause purchases
  • Jobs have functional AND emotional/social dimensions
  • Same product can serve different jobs (= may need different products)
  • Jobs persist over time — products come and go
The JTBD Pyramid
  • Layer 1: What JOB is the customer trying to get done?
  • Layer 2: What EXPERIENCES must we provide?
  • Layer 3: How must we INTEGRATE to deliver?
  • Layer 4: What PURPOSE BRAND makes them think of us first?
  • Integration = the real moat (Disney 40yr, IKEA 50yr)
Finding Jobs
  • Observe yourself — "why am I doing this?"
  • Study current customers — why do they buy?
  • Study former customers — they just leave silently
  • Find non-customers — who has the job but can't hire?
  • Watch for compensating behaviors — workarounds = unmet jobs
Hire, Don't Buy Job → Experience → Integration → Brand Competitors Aren't Who You Think Demographics ≠ Causality

Was this helpful?